As of September 30, 2009, FDSDI had 283 open appellate cases. Over the past fiscal year, FDSDI opened 124 appellate cases and closed 36. During that year, the Court of Appeals entered approximately 70 appellate decisions in FDSDI cases. Among those decisions, FDSDI gained relief on behalf of its clients in 13 of them. Fourteen of the Court of Appeals'various decisions were published, and FDSDI prevailed in four of those.
The published reversals included significant opinions. FDSDI prevailed in the decision in
United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez, 567 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir.2009), which was the first post-Booker published
decision finding a within-guidelines sentence substantively unreasonable. FDSDI prevailed in
United States v. Aguila-Montes de Oca, 553 F.3d 1229 (9th Cir. 2009), in which the Ninth Circuit
abandoned a line of cases lasting nearly 20 years, and held that California burglaries are not
"generic burglaries" under federal law. In Owino v. Napolitano, 575 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2009)
and Owino v. Holder, 575 F.3d 956 (9th Cir. 2009), FDSDI prevailed in challenges to an alien's
deportation order as well his indefinite detention.
FSDSI also filed numerous petitions for writs of certiorari. In at least seven of them,
the Supreme Court ordered a response. Of those cases, only one has been resolved thus far. The remaining six are pending.
©2010 Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc. All rights reserved.
*The material found on this Web site is for informational purposes only. It should not be considered to be legal advice and is not guaranteed to be complete or up to date. Use of this Web site is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between the user and Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc.. (FDSDI) or any of the firm's attorneys. Readers should not rely upon or act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. See full disclaimer.